Who's fast ? Cobalt records or Joomla! core content ?

based on my experience,

Cobalt, i'm trying

joomla core content is fastest because it does not use field (except with Content builder or Flexicontent)

i have a big website build with seblod, it is very fast (around 75000 maybe more records)

K2 is fast if not too much articles because after there is problem with speed

Zoo slow very slow with a huge numbers of records

but ATTENTION : you need have in consideration server configuration (shared, vps, cloud or dedicated)

okey you want mean here :

• Cobalt : Not yet tested
• Joomla! Core Content : Fast (what about memory and cpu usage ?)
• Seblod : Very Fast For 75000 records (what about memory and cpu usage ?)
• K2 : Fast For few records (what about memory and cpu usage ?)
• Zoo : Very slow ( Yes i agree all users know that)

Cobalt : Not yet tested Yes i'm testing now

Cobalt : Not yet tested

Joomla! Core Content : Fast (what about memory and cpu usage ?)

• Seblod : Very Fast For 75000 records (what about memory and cpu usage ?) Yes after a big numbers of records you nedd cloud or dedicated

To make any statement, the setup should be always the same.

Same server environment, same basic installation and same content.

If the components support relation fields, they should also be tested. Comparing different installations with subjective comments should not be the basis of comparison.

@Andi amine, i would suggest you create different setups (plain html field. several fields without relations, several fields with 1 relation, several fields with several relations) and replicate the same demo content in all components. Then test it extensively. Thats the time you can get some results.

Hope to see your findings here on the support desk.

Good luck with your speed testing and comparison.